Эксперт
Сергей
Сергей
Задать вопрос
Мы готовы помочь Вам.

 

Forensic Odontology

Forensic odontology is the technical term for examining evidence based on dentistry. Using this science, people can be identified based on their dental records. Additionally, a criminal who left a bite mark may be identifiable by his or her dental work in cases where there is no other identifying evidence. This method has been around for many years. It has been used to establish identity after plane crashes, car crashes, or other situations in which there is no other form of identification. Bite marks can also help investigators make conclusions about the type of crime that was committed, such as in the case of bite marks left by a victim of a crime who is acting in self defense.

In the court case People vs. Marx, a case involving dental forensics, the defendant’s teeth marks were found on his victim. The lawyers referred to the marks as “similarities” between the impressions on the victim and the impression given by the defendant. In this case, the question was brought up about the number of similarities that constitutes conclusive evidence. It was determined that it is not only the number of similarities but also the quality of those similarities that matters.

The first step to collecting forensic dental evidence is to take pictures. Second, the forensic dentist takes impressions of the bite marks. Third, if a suspect is arrested, the dentist may make impressions of his or her teeth to see if they match. The biggest problem is that accurate impressions are hard to acquire because most bite-related injuries involve movement of the jaw and tongue, and they cause damage to the skin, which alters the impression made by the bite. In many instances, only partial impressions are possible. Even though there are challenges, forensic odontology evidence is widely used and a highly respected form of evidence.

1. Forensic odontology can provide evidence about crimes involving bites.
  A) True     B) False
2. When no other identifying evidence is available, dental records can help investigators identify bodies.
  A) True     B) False

Reading Comprehension: Multiple Choice     Choose the option that best completes each sentence.

3. Forensic odontology has been around for a long time and helps to ___ when there is no other identifying evidence.
  A) identify victims who have been bitten B) identify the reasons behind plane crashes and car crashes
  C) identify bodies through dental records D) determine the time of death of victims
4. Bite marks can also help investigators do all of the following except ___.
  A) determine the type of crime that was committed B) give definite answers about the motive behind crimes
  C) identify the criminal based on his or her dental records D) identify accident victims when there is no other identifying evidence
5. The Marx case is often connected with forensic odontology because it was determined that the ___ was not the only consideration. The ___ also matters.
  A) quality of the photographs / reputation of the dentist B) quality of similarities / reputation of the dentist
  C) number of similarities / time that elapses between crime and investigation D) number of similarities / quality of similarities
6. The biggest problem with dental forensics is that ___ are hard to acquire.
  A) samples of teeth B) accurate impressions
  C) accurate photographs D) reliable witnesses

Vocabulary: Word Families     Choose the word form that correctly completes each sentence.

7. ____ with a lawyer before you sign any important contract.
  A) Consultation     B) Consultant     C) Consult
8. The man, in ____ with his lawyers, decided to plead guilty to the charge of fraud.
  A) consultation     B) consultant     C) consult
 

9.

 

The attorney for the defense hired a financial ____ to look at the accountants’ reports and summarize them for the jury.

  A) consultation     B) consultant     C) consult
10. The district attorney focused on trying to ____ that the defendant had participated in a series of questionable activities.
  A) establishment     B) establish     C) established
11. The forensics team presented their evidence ____ that the defendant was at the scene of the crime.
  A) establishments     B) established     C) establishing
12. Because her family had a lot of problems with the police, it is not surprising that Connie did not trust the ____.
  A) establishment     B) establishes     C) established

Vocabulary: Multiple Choice     Choose the word that best completes each sentence.

13. In one ___, the culprit was actually one of the investigators on the case.
  A) revolution     B) instance     C) conclusion     D) motive
14. The scientists were able to ___ that their theory was correct by conducting detailed, technical experiments with the evidence.
  A) establish     B) motivate     C) revolt     D) conclude
15. Unable to ___ that the defendant had access to the weapon, the attorney had to dismiss the case.
  A) minimize     B) consult     C) motivate     D) establish
16. Please write a detailed report and ___ how you plan to pay for the equipment.
  A) detect     B) specify     C) conclude     D) consult
17. The jury came to a ___ conclusion: the defendant was not at the scene of the crime because multiple witnesses testified that he was at work that day.
  A) technical     B) minimal     C) logical     D) contrary
18. After ___ with the psychiatrist, the judge decided to dismiss the charges against the parents.
  A) consultation     B) conclusion     C) motivation     D) specification
19. Surprisingly, the verdict proved to be ___ to what the judge had expected.
  A) minimal     B) contrary     C) inherent     D) conclusive

Vocabulary: Fill in the blank     Use the words in the box to complete the sentences. Use each word one time.

tape panel site  
technical motive specific  
consult authority detect  
20. Please give specific details about where you were between 8:00 p.m. last night and 4:00 a.m. today.
21. Although he had a problem with respecting authority, Tony knew he had to listen to the police officer.
22. The team was unable to detect any chemicals at the crime scene.
23. They knew he was guilty of the crime based on the evidence, but they never discovered his motive. They will always wonder why he did it.
24. Several technical aspects of the investigation were left to the team of forensics specialists, while the personal aspects were left to the social workers and psychiatrists.
25. The panel of experts decided that he was ready to enter society again.
26. Determined to get a second opinion, the patient will consult with another doctor before agreeing to the painful procedure.
27. When they watched the tape from the grocery store security camera, it was clear that one of the employees had been stealing.
28. They are already clearing the site where the new police station will be built.

 

 

Writing Prompts     Read the questions. Write your answers in paragraph form.

29. Many people believe that advancements in forensics are making verdicts more accurate. For example, we now have DNA technology to help identify criminals. Do you feel that these types of advancements actually improve our legal system? Why or why not?

 

 

   

 

 

Many people believe that advancements in forensics are making verdicts more accurate.

It should be said that forensic science has been a basic academic discipline in the system of training highly qualified lawyers for over a hundred years. Over the past years, it has become obvious that obtaining a legal education without studying her scientific achievements is becoming flawed, not meeting the realities of today. Currently, the role of forensic methods and tools is steadily increasing. Moreover, not only criminal, but also in civil, arbitration, administrative and constitutional proceedings. This can be considered quite natural, since the integration and differentiation of scientific knowledge makes it possible to use more and more scientific achievements in procedural knowledge.

Moreover, forensic experts are convinced that the problems of using the scientific provisions and practical recommendations developed by them are of a common nature for the process of proving all types of offenses, regardless of the characteristics of the corresponding procedural activity. This is confirmed by the fact that forensic recommendations are applied in the collection, verification, assessment and use of evidence in any kind of process.

I believe that advancements in forensics actually improve our legal system.

Была ли полезна данная статья?
Да
61.09%
Нет
38.91%
Проголосовало: 1105

или напишите нам прямо сейчас:

⚠️ Пожалуйста, пишите в MAX или заполните форму выше.
В России Telegram и WhatsApp блокируют - сообщения могут не дойти.
Написать в MAXНаписать в TelegramНаписать в WhatsApp